I am seeking a licensed veterinarian to review a completed manuscript and provide expert editorial feedback. This role focuses on scientific accuracy, clinical realism, biological plausibility, and ethical framing rather than line-editing or rewriting. The ideal candidate is comfortable engaging with long-form nonfiction or narrative work and offering thoughtful, written commentary from a veterinary and animal-health perspective.
Key Responsibilities
Review a full manuscript (nonfiction / narrative nonfiction / science-informed work)
Identify inaccuracies, outdated assumptions, or oversimplifications in veterinary, biological, or animal-health content
Provide margin notes or written commentary on:
Veterinary realism and clinical plausibility
Animal welfare and ethical considerations
Use of veterinary terminology and concepts
Alignment with current standards of care and scientific understanding
Flag areas where clarification, nuance, or reframing would improve credibility
Suggest high-level improvements or alternative approaches where appropriate (without rewriting the text)
What This Role Is Not
Not copyediting or proofreading
Not ghostwriting or co-authoring
Not responsible for citation formatting or stylistic edits
Qualifications
DVM or equivalent veterinary degree (licensed or previously licensed)
Strong grounding in veterinary medicine, animal biology, or animal welfare
Ability to communicate complex scientific concepts clearly in written feedback
Comfort reviewing long-form manuscripts (book-length or similar)
Prior experience with publishing, research review, teaching, or science communication is a plus
Engagement Details
Project-based / contract role
Remote
Compensation commensurate with experience and scope
NDA required
To Apply
Please provide:
Brief background (clinical, academic, or industry experience)
Any experience reviewing scientific or published material (formal or informal)
Availability and preferred review format (inline comments, memo, or both)